Firmness on Terrorism is Justified, But Diplomacy Must Remain Open

By Rajat Kumar Mohindru.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent address on 13th May 2025 powerfully reiterated India’s uncompromising stance against terrorism. His message was clear: “Talks, Trade, and Terror cannot go together.” In light of the horrific attack in Pahalgam, where 26 innocent tourists were killed, India’s swift military response through Operation Sindoor appears to reflect both national sentiment and strategic resolve.

India’s assertion of zero tolerance towards terrorism is not only understandable but necessary in an era when cross-border terrorism continues to claim innocent lives. The fact that Indian Armed Forces carefully targeted terrorist camps while ensuring civilian safety reflects professionalism and discipline. Furthermore, the Indian Army's technological preparedness in neutralizing Pakistani drone incursions has reinforced national security and civilian confidence.

At the same time, the ceasefire agreement on 10th May and the subsequent decision to temporarily suspend military operations shows India’s maturity in balancing force with diplomacy. The Prime Minister rightly warned against nuclear blackmail, reinforcing that strategic threats cannot be allowed to undermine India’s sovereignty.

However, while military action may be an immediate necessity, it is not a permanent solution. History shows us that war leads to long-term destruction, displacement, and pain — as remembered by those who lived through the 1962, 1965, and 1971 wars. Sustainable peace will only come through honest diplomacy, not just ceasefires. For any meaningful progress, Pakistan must act decisively against terror groups operating from its soil.

India, on its part, should remain open to talks — but only when concrete actions, not just promises, are evident from the other side. A peaceful South Asia will not only prevent bloodshed but can also unlock immense economic, cultural, and human potential.

In conclusion, India's firm stance on terror is justified and necessary, but a cautious openness to dialogue must remain alive. Peace must be pursued with wisdom, courage, and a deep commitment to justice. 

(Author is a Jalandhar-based freelance journalist) 

Views are personal